Child sexual abuse material (previously known as child pornography) can be a confronting and uncomfortable topic.
Child sexual abuse material specifically refers to the possession, viewing, sharing, and creation of images or videos containing sexual or offensive material involving children.
But less publicised is another form of child sexual abuse material: virtual child sexual abuse material (VCSAM).
What’s virtual child sexual abuse material (VCSAM)?
VCSAM is sexual content depicting fictitious children in formats such as text, drawings, deepfakes, or computer-generated graphics. It’s also known as fictional child pornography, pseudo pornography, or fantasy images.
Recent technological advancements mean fictitious children can now be virtually indistinguishable from real children in child sexual abuse material.
Some offenders create VCSAM through a morphing technique which uses technology to transform real images into exploitative ones.
A non-sexual image of a real child could be visually altered to include sexual content. For example a child holding a toy altered to depict the child holding adult genitals.
Morphing can also happen in the reverse, where an image of an adult is morphed to look like a child – for example adult breasts are altered to look prepubescent.
Another type of VCSAM includes photo-editing multiple images to create a final, more realistic airbrushed image.
But what might be most troubling about VCSAM is it may still feature images and videos of real children being sexually abused.
In fact, certain software can be used to make images and videos of real victims look like “fictional” drawings or cartoons.
In this way, this allows offenders to effectively disguise a real act of child sexual abuse, potentially preventing law enforcement from bringing victims to safety.
It may also enable repeat offenders to avoid detection.
Why do some people engage with VCSAM?
There’s limited evidence revealing why some people might engage with VCSAM.
To learn more about this offending group, we recently investigated the possible psychological basis for people who engage with such material.
We discovered several potential reasons why offenders might use VCSAM.
Some used it for relationship-building.
Online communities of other deviant but like-minded people may therefore provide offenders with a greater sense of belonging, social validation, and support. Such interactions may also, in turn, serve as positive reinforcement for their criminal behaviour.
Others may use this material to achieve sexual arousal.
It could be argued the material may also normalise the sexualisation of children.
In fact, professionals in child welfare and law enforcement seem to share the concern that VCSAM may “fuel the abuse” of children by framing the offenders’ criminal behaviour as acceptable.
Sometimes the material is used for “grooming”.
This is one form of grooming – that is, predatory conduct aimed to facilitate later sexual activity with a child.
Such material can also be used to teach children how to engage in sexual activities.
For example, offenders may use VCSAM to show children material depicting young – and, most alarmingly, happy – cartoon characters engaging in sexual activities.
An urgent cause for concern
Clearly, VCSAM is incredibly harmful.
Child welfare and law enforcement officials have sounded the alarm about the increasing creation and distribution of VCSAM for over a decade.
And it seems this problem will only escalate with the development of increasingly sophisticated software and digital technologies.
So while VCSAM remains illegal and offenders are frequently prosecuted, detecting – and ultimately preventing – these often obscure acts of abuse remains a challenge.